?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Bizarre reasoning

Regarding our great leader's encounter with a pot of green custard this morning, John Prescott said that "it was 'totally unacceptable' that Ms Deen had been able to walk away after the incident without being arrested, arguing that she could have been carrying acid rather than custard." (BBC website)

So she should have been arrested for possibly carrying acid rather than actualling damaging Mandy's coat? How does that work?

Comments

( 7 comments — Leave a comment )
pond823
Mar. 6th, 2009 02:03 pm (UTC)
Thought crime, it's the new terriorism.
davidt3001
Mar. 6th, 2009 03:22 pm (UTC)
Well, had she thrown acid at the flambouyant, improper loan-accepting, back-stabbing, truth distorting fuck up, she wouldn't have been allowed to walk away, would she?

Mandy's special branch shadows would have shot her, or at least maced her ...
cleanskies
Mar. 6th, 2009 03:26 pm (UTC)
I don't know, I think Prescott sounds a bit peeved that it wasn't acid...
kruku
Mar. 6th, 2009 06:33 pm (UTC)
Mr Prescott should be aware that Ms Deen is representing the will of the people; Mandy is very bland. He obviously requires 'bizarre seasoning'.
fractalgeek
Mar. 7th, 2009 12:06 am (UTC)
I'd just like to say that a few years ago, when he was better known as "The Fat Controller", I had to halt myself abruptly as said Mr Prescott walked straight through in front of me, on a pavement opposite parliment. Of course, if I had realised who it was before stopping...
chilledchimp
Mar. 7th, 2009 02:58 am (UTC)
Wonder if there are any wags in your works canteen? A little food colouring in the right place could prove amusing next time Mandy pops in for lunch.
kruku
Mar. 7th, 2009 02:06 pm (UTC)
:D
( 7 comments — Leave a comment )